The Effect of a Temporary Stoma on Long-term Functional Outcomes Following Surgery for Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with rectal cancer may undergo surgical resection with or without a temporary stoma. OBJECTIVE: This study primarily aimed to compare long-term functional outcomes between patients with and without a temporary stoma after surgery for rectal cancer. The secondary aim was to investigate the effect of time to stoma reversal on functional outcomes. DESIGN: This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at 7 Dutch hospitals. PATIENTS: Included were patients who had undergone rectal cancer surgery (2009-2015). Excluded were deceased patients, who were deceased, had a permanent stoma, or had intellectual disability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional outcomes were measured using the Rome IV criteria for constipation and fecal incontinence and the low anterior resection syndrome score. RESULTS: Of 656 patients, 32% received a temporary ileostomy and 20% a temporary colostomy (86% response). Follow-up was at 56 (interquartile range, 38.5-79) months. Patients who had a temporary ileostomy experienced less constipation, more fecal incontinence, and more major low anterior resection syndrome than those without a temporary stoma. Patients who had a temporary colostomy experienced more major low anterior resection syndrome than those without a temporary stoma. A temporary ileostomy or colostomy was not associated with constipation or fecal incontinence after correction for confounding factors (eg, anastomotic height, anastomotic leakage, radiotherapy). Time to stoma reversal was not associated with constipation, fecal incontinence, or major low anterior resection syndrome. LIMITATIONS: Cross-sectional design. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with a temporary ileostomy or colostomy have worse functional outcomes in the long term, it seems that the reason for creating a temporary stoma, rather than the stoma itself, underlies this phenomenon. Time to reversal of a temporary stoma does not influence functional outcomes. See Video Abstract . EL EFECTO DEL ESTOMA TEMPORAL SOBRE LOS RESULTADOS FUNCIONALES A LARGO PLAZO DESPUS DE LA CIRUGA POR CNCER DE RECTO: ANTECEDENTES:Los pacientes con cáncer de recto pueden someterse a resección quirúrgica con o sin un estoma temporal.OBJETIVO:El objetivo principal de este estudio fue comparar los resultados funcionales a largo plazo entre pacientes con y sin estoma temporal después de cirugía por cáncer de recto. El objetivo secundario fue investigar el efecto del tiempo transcurrido hasta la reversión del estoma sobre los resultados funcionales.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio transversal multicéntrico.ESCENARIO:Este estudio se llevó a cabo en siete hospitales holandeses.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes sometidos a cirugía de cáncer de recto (2009-2015). Se excluyeron pacientes fallecidos, pacientes con estoma permanente o discapacidad intelectual.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los resultados funcionales se midieron utilizando los criterios de Roma IV para el estreñimiento y la incontinencia fecal y la puntuación del síndrome de resección anterior baja (LARS).RESULTADOS:De 656 pacientes, el 32% recibió una ileostomía temporal y el 20% una colostomía temporal (respuesta del 86%). El seguimiento fue de 56.0 (RIQ 38.5-79.0) meses. Los pacientes a los que se les realizó una ileostomía temporal experimentaron menos estreñimiento, más incontinencia fecal y más LARS mayor que los pacientes sin un estoma temporal. Los pacientes que tuvieron una colostomía temporal experimentaron más LARS mayor que los pacientes sin un estoma temporal. Una ileostomía o colostomía temporal no se asoció con estreñimiento o incontinencia fecal después de la corrección de factores de confusión (p. ej., altura anastomótica, fuga anastomótica, radioterapia). El tiempo hasta la reversión del estoma no se asoció con estreñimiento, incontinencia fecal o LARS mayor.LIMITACIONES:El presente estudio está limitado por su diseño transversal.CONCLUSIONES:Aunque los pacientes con una ileostomía o colostomía temporal tienen peores resultados funcionales a largo plazo, parece que la razón para crear un estoma temporal, más que el estoma en sí, se asocia a este fenómeno. El tiempo hasta la reversión de un estoma temporal no influye en los resultados funcionales. (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco ).

Surgical techniques for mesenteric lengthening in ileoanal pouch surgery: a systematic review.

AIM: The key to successful construction of an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis is the ability of the pouch reservoir to reach the anus well vascularized and without tension. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview of previously described different surgical lengthening techniques to achieve adequate length for a tension-free IPAA. METHOD: Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. Two reviewers conducted a systematic search with combinations of keywords for the surgical procedure and surgical lengthening techniques. All publications that reported one or more surgical lengthening techniques during IPAA surgery in adult patients were selected, consisting of reviews, cohort studies, case reports, human cadaver studies and expert opinions. The primary outcomes measured were the different surgical lengthening techniques and the step-by-step approach they involve that can be used during surgery to achieve adequate length for an IPAA. RESULTS: Of 1577 records reviewed, 19 articles were included in this systematic review describing at least 1181 patients (i.e. one review, four retrospective studies, five human cadaver studies, two case reports and seven expert opinions). A total of six different surgical lengthening techniques with various subtechniques were found and described, consisting of pouch folding, construction of different types of pouches, stepladder incisions, skeletonization of vessels, division and ligation of mesenteric vessels and using an interposition vein graft. No prospective or randomized controlled trials were performed regarding this topic. Quality assessment showed a medium quality of the included studies. CONCLUSION: Different surgical lengthening techniques are described in a step-by-step approach to create adequate mesenteric length during IPAA surgery, in patients in whom the ileal pouch cannot reach the dentate line.

Functional outcomes of surgery for colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: As survival rates of colon cancer increase, knowledge about functional outcomes is becoming ever more important. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to quantify functional outcomes after surgery for colon cancer. Secondly, we aimed to determine the effect of time to follow-up and type of colectomy on postoperative functional outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies reporting bowel function following surgery for colon cancer. Outcome parameters were bowel function scores and/or prevalence of bowel symptoms. Additionally, the effect of time to follow-up and type of resection was analyzed. RESULTS: In total 26 studies were included, describing bowel function between 3 to 178 months following right hemicolectomy (n = 4207), left hemicolectomy/sigmoid colon resection (n = 4211), and subtotal/total colectomy (n = 161). In 16 studies (61.5%) a bowel function score was used. Pooled prevalence for liquid and solid stool incontinence was 24.1% and 6.9%, respectively. The most prevalent constipation-associated symptoms were incomplete evacuation and obstructive, difficult emptying (33.3% and 31.4%, respectively). Major Low Anterior Resection Syndrome was present in 21.1%. No differences between time to follow-up or type of colectomy were found. CONCLUSION: Bowel function problems following surgery for colon cancer are common, show no improvement over time and do not depend on the type of colectomy. Apart from fecal incontinence, constipation-associated symptoms are also highly prevalent. Therefore, more attention should be paid to all possible aspects of bowel dysfunction following surgery for colon cancer and targeted treatment should commence promptly.

Fecal Continence for Solid and Liquid Stool: The Function of the Anal-External Sphincter Continence Reflex and the Puborectal Continence Reflex.

BACKGROUND: The anal-external sphincter continence reflex and the puborectal continence reflex control fecal continence by involuntary contractions of the external anal sphincter and puborectal muscle. To date it is unknown what the effect of liquid stool is on these reflexes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the consequence of liquid stool on the presence and function of these fecal continence reflexes. DESIGN: This was a prospective, observational study. SETTING: The study was conducted at the Anorectal Physiology Laboratory, University Medical Center Groningen. PATIENTS: Forty-two healthy subjects were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pressure changes at the level of the external anal sphincter and the puborectal muscle during the anorectal pressure test used to measure voluntary contractions, the balloon retention test used to measure involuntary contractions mimicking solid stool, and the rectal infusion test used to investigate the effect of only water mimicking liquid stool were measured. RESULTS: During the test mimicking solid stool, the pressure at the level of the external anal sphincter increased from the start to the end (132 ± 54 vs 198 ± 69 mm Hg; p < 0.001). The pressure at the level of the puborectal muscle increased simultaneously (30 ± 9 vs 176 ± 52 mm Hg; p < 0.001). After injecting water into the rectum, mimicking liquid stool, we observed immediate activation of the anal-external sphincter continence reflex (87 ± 32 vs 145 ± 36 mm Hg; p < 0.001); this was after a median 30 seconds, whereas no activation of the puborectal continence reflex appeared (26 ± 9 vs 26 ± 7 mm Hg; p = 0.655). LIMITATIONS: We only performed anorectal function tests mimicking 2 types of stool consistencies, namely water and solid. CONCLUSIONS: The anal-external sphincter continence reflex controls fecal continence of both solid and liquid stool. Contrarily, the puborectal continence reflex contributes to solid stool continence only. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B286. CONTINENCIA FECAL PARA HECES SÓLIDAS Y LÍQUIDAS: LA FUNCIÓN DEL REFLEJO DE CONTINENCIA DEL ESFÍNTER ANAL EXTERNO Y EL REFLEJO DE CONTINENCIA PUBORRECTAL: El reflejo de continencia del esfínter anal externo y el reflejo de continencia puborrectal controlan la continencia fecal mediante contracciones involuntarias del esfínter anal externo y el músculo puborrectal, respectivamente. Hasta la fecha, se desconoce cuál es el efecto de las heces líquidas en estos reflejos.Analizar las consecuencias de las heces líquidas en la presencia y función de estos reflejos de continencia fecal.Estudio prospectivo observacional.Laboratorio de F fisiología anorrectal, University Medical Center Groningen.Cuarenta y dos sujetos sanos.Los cambios de presión a nivel del esfínter anal externo y el músculo puborrectal durante la prueba de presión anorrectal utilizada para medir las contracciones voluntarias, la prueba de retención con balón utilizada para medir las contracciones involuntarias que imitan las heces sólidas, y la prueba de infusión rectal utilizada para investigar El el efecto de solo agua imitando las heces líquidas.Durante la prueba que imita las heces sólidas, la presión a nivel del esfínter anal externo aumentó desde el principio hasta el final (132 ± 54 mm Hg versus 198 ± 69 mm Hg, p <0.001). La presión a nivel del músculo puborrectal aumentó simultáneamente (30 ± 9 mm Hg versus 176 ± 52 mm Hg, p <0,001).Después de inyectar agua en el recto, imitando las heces líquidas, observamos la activación inmediata del AESCR (87 ± 32 mm Hg versus 145 ± 36 mm Hg, p <0.001), esto fue después de una mediana de 30 segundos, mientras que no hubo activación de la continencia puborrectal apareció reflejo (26 ± 9 mm Hg versus 26 ± 7 mm Hg, p = 0,655).Solo realizamos pruebas de función anorrectal que imitan dos tipos de consistencia de heces, a saber, discriminando entre a agua y sólidos.El reflejo de continencia del esfínter anal-externo controla la continencia fecal de las heces sólidas y líquidas. Por el contrario, el reflejo de continencia puborrectal contribuye solo a la continencia de heces sólidas. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B286. (Traducción-Dr Adrian Ortega).

Fecal continence outcomes are associated with the type, height, and stage procedure of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

PURPOSE: This study aims to analyze the quality of life in patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and to investigate the association between height and type of the anastomosis, the number of stage procedures and age, and the fecal continence outcomes. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional retrospective study in patients who had undergone IPAA between 1992 and 2016 (N = 133). We sent questionnaires to 102 eligible patients (64% response rate). We used the Wexner score to assess fecal incontinence: 0 = no incontinence to 20 = complete incontinence. We used RAND-36 to measure quality of life. RESULTS: Patients who underwent mucosectomy with hand-sewn anastomoses (n = 11, 17%) had significantly higher median Wexner scores than patients with stapled anastomoses (10 versus 3, P = 0.003). Lower anastomoses correlated significantly with increasing Wexner scores (r = - 0.468, P < 0.001). Quality of life of incontinent patients was diminished. Patients who were older at the time of IPAA surgery had higher Wexner scores (P = 0.004), while the time between surgery and questionnaire did not influence their Wexner scores (P = 0.810). Considering the stage procedures, multiple linear regression showed that the two-stage procedure without diverting ileostomy was significantly associated with higher Wexner scores (B = 0.815, P = 0.02), adjusted for sex (P = 0.008) and anastomosis type (P = 0.002). The three-stage procedure showed equally low complications and anastomotic leakage rates. CONCLUSION: Mucosectomy with more distal, hand-sewn anastomosis and increasing age at IPAA surgery was associated with poorer fecal continence outcomes. The three-stage procedure appears to give the best fecal continence results without increasing complications. Furthermore, incontinence reduced patient's quality of life.

The puborectal continence reflex: a new regulatory mechanism controlling fecal continence.

PURPOSE: Fecal continence is maintained by voluntary and involuntary contraction of the anal sphincter, and voluntary contractions of puborectal muscle. We investigated whether the puborectal muscle can control fecal continence not only by voluntary contractions but also by involuntary contractions. METHODS: We performed anorectal function tests in 23 healthy subjects. The anorectal pressure test was used to investigate voluntary contractions of the puborectal muscle. The balloon retention test was used to assess if the puborectal muscle can contract involuntarily. RESULTS: During the balloon retention test, we observed an involuntary contraction of the puborectal muscle, which gradually increased during progressive filling of the rectum. The maximal involuntary contraction of the puborectal muscle was significantly stronger and longer than its maximal voluntary contraction (150 versus 70 mmHg, P < 0.001 and 5.8 versus 1.5 min, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the puborectal muscle is able to contract involuntarily during rectal dilatation. It is a new regulatory mechanism, called the puborectal continence reflex, which controls fecal continence by involuntary contraction of the puborectal muscle. It seems to be initiated by dilatation at the level of the puborectal muscle. Presumably, the puborectal continence reflex protects many patients with anal sphincter dysfunctions from fecal incontinence.

Underdiagnosis of Mild Congenital Anorectal Malformations.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the frequency and severity of congenital anorectal malformations (CARMs) differs by sex. STUDY DESIGN: We included 129 patients (0-319 weeks old) diagnosed with CARMs, who had been referred to our Department of Pediatric Surgery between 2004 and 2013. Rectoperineal and rectovestibular fistulas were classified as mild CARMs, all others as severe. If a patient was diagnosed with CARM within 48 hours after birth, this was considered an early diagnosis, all others as late. RESULTS: Seventy-five (58%) girls and 54 (42%) boys were diagnosed with different forms of CARM. More patients had mild rather than severe forms of CARM (67% and 33%, respectively, P <.001). We found that 89% of girls had a mild form of CARM, whereas 65% of boys had severe forms (P <.001). All severe forms were diagnosed early, whereas 54% mild forms were diagnosed early and 46% were diagnosed late. CONCLUSIONS: Girls more often have mild forms of CARM, whereas boys more often have severe forms. Overall, the distribution across the sexes is equal. Because chronic constipation can be the only symptom of mild CARMs, it often requires more time to diagnose than severe forms. Many women are, therefore, diagnosed with CARMs at an older age, or they may go undiagnosed altogether. Subsequently, these women have a greater risk of full rupture during vaginal delivery.

Congenital Anorectal Malformation Severity Does Not Predict Severity of Congenital Heart Defects.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of congenital heart defects (CHDs) in patients with mild or severe congenital anorectal malformations (CARMs), and whether all patients with CARM need pediatric cardiology screening. STUDY DESIGN: We included 129 patients with CARM born between 2004 and 2013, and referred to University Medical Center Groningen. Recto-perineal and recto-vestibular fistulas were classified as mild CARMs, all others as severe. Significant patent foramen ovale, secundum atrial septal defect, and small ventricular septum defect were classified as minor CHDs, all others as major. RESULTS: Of 129 patients with CARM, 67% had mild CARM, 33% severe CARM, and 17% were additionally diagnosed with CHD. CHDs were distributed equally in patients with mild or severe CARMs. Patients with multiple congenital abnormalities were more frequently diagnosed with CHD (n = 16, 36%) than patients without multiple congenital malformations (n = 5, 9%, P = .001). Patients with CARM diagnosed with CHD using pediatric cardiac echo screening were younger than 3 months of age at diagnosis. Earlier general pediatric examinations missed 7 (50%) children with mild and 4 (50%) with severe CHDs. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of CARM could predict neither prevalence nor severity of CHD. More than one-half of CHDs were missed during the first physical examination. No new CHDs were found in patients older than 3 months of age at the time CARMs were diagnosed. We recommend screening all patients with CARM younger than 3 months of age for CHD at the time CARM is diagnosed. Preoperative echocardiography should be the rule in children younger than 3 months of age and with multiple congenital anomalies.